The Nasw Code Of Ethics - 1266 Words

After reviewing the NASW Code of Ethics, I am confident that my personal values will conform well to the social work profession. There are a few personal values of mine that may conflict to the social work profession; however, I will most certainly use my professional judgement to ensure that I will not break the NASW Code of Ethics. Overall, I found that many of my personal values were mentioned in the NASW Code of Ethics. There are several personal values of mine that conform well to the social work profession and NASW Code of Ethics. I am a firm believer in promoting social justice. I have recognized that there are many groups in our society that are oppressed against, thus I believe this personal value of mine will contribute well to†¦show more content†¦Being an advocate for women who experience domestic violence, is very important to me. I believe this personal value of mine will be extremely important in the social work profession because I can truly show empathy towards women who have been abused, thus promoting social justice is so important to me. Another personal value of mine is promoting equality. I mentioned in the previous paragraph that certain groups of people have been oppressed in our society, thus I believe everyone should be treated equally. Women most certainly have, but I have also seen how certain ethnic groups in our society are continually oppressed against. I believe that all people should be treated the same. It does not matter what color skin you have, what religion group you belong to, or what sexual preference you have, we all bleed the same blood. Living in a low-income area in Saint Paul, I have seen first-hand how Asian Americans and African Americans are treated differently. My mother has always taught my sister and I to try and treat everyone with the same respect we would expect to receive; therefore, this personal value correlates well to the cultural competence and social diversity mentioned in the NASW Code of Ethics. I try my hardest to step in when I recognize that certain individuals are not being treated with dignity and worth. There was an Asian girl in one of my classes in elementary school, and the other kids picked on her because she

The Ethics For Respect For Nature - 1477 Words

In Paul Taylor’s essay, â€Å"The Ethics for Respect for Nature,† he argues that†¦ In this paper I will first describe Taylor’s concept of â€Å"respect for nature.† I will then explain the part this attitude plays in rationally grounding a biocentric outlook on environmental ethics. Lastly, I will present Rosalind Hursthouse’s criticism of Taylor’s view, and state how Taylor might respond to this criticism. Paul Taylor approaches â€Å"respect for nature† as a moral attitude, meaning that if an individual is unable to comprehend the â€Å"meaning and conditions of applicability† of the attitude, they are also unable to have the attitude as a part of their â€Å"moral outlook† (Taylor 103). â€Å"Respect for nature† is defined by two essential concepts, the good of a being, and the concept of inherent worth. The good of a being is applicable to â€Å"every organism, species population, and community of lifeâ €  (Taylor 103). An entity has a good of its own if, â€Å"without reference to any other entity, it can be benefited or harmed† (Taylor 103). Simply stated, what is advantageous for an entity in the sense of â€Å"enhancing or preserving its life and well-being† is good for it (Taylor 103). What is disadvantageous for an entity in the sense of being â€Å"detrimental to its life and well-being† is not good for it (Taylor 103). The good of an â€Å"individual nonhuman organism† is realized to the extent that it is â€Å"strong and healthy† (Taylor 103). An entity is said to be â€Å"strong and healthy† to Taylor if it â€Å"possessesShow MoreRelatedRespect Of Nature : A Theory Of Environmental Ethics Essay1511 Words   |  7 Pagesfield of environmental ethics. In 1996, Taylor published the book Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics, in which he argues for the theory of Biocentrism. Biocentrism, in Taylor’s words, is an attitude of respect for nature, whereby one attempts to make an effort to live one s life in a way that respects the welfare and inherent worth of all living creatures. This egalitarian theory is a biologically-informed, philosophical worldview about humans, nature, and the place of humanRead MoreImpact Of Age And Wealth On Respect And Greed1525 Words   |  7 PagesWhat is the impact of Age and Wealth on Respect and Greed? – Impact of Norm and Value Some may describe age as a number however, age is a term that is generally a representation of the amount of experiences a person has had throughout their lives and an older person is therefore termed as older because of the number of experiences they have had. Same is the case with wealth. People may have different definitions of wealth like a person who has achieved what he/she aimed to may be termed as wealthRead MoreHow the Core of Nursing Helps to Prevent Abuse in Age Care637 Words   |  3 Pagesmany numerous abuses by physicians and nurses alike. Is it right? Is it justifiable? Of course, the answer is no. The nursing profession has a code of ethics, just like other professions that spell out what professional behavior is acceptable in the profession. The code of ethics puts accountability on nurses to show compassion, dignity, and respect to patients and others alike. As patients go through the aging process, they lose abilities for activities of daily living and sometimes dementia setsRead MoreThe Land Ethic By Aldo Leopold1055 Words   |  5 Pagesthe chapter â€Å"The Land Ethic†, Leopold invokes a rethinking of our relationships to our world and is based on the principle that ethics are â€Å"a process in ecological evolution† (238). Leopold describes the stages of ethic evolving and explains that the rules for socializing were originally defined for human beings. These rules are expanded upon in the next stage of â€Å"Ethical Sequence† (237-238), describing how humans interact toward their community. The third stage is the ethics between humans and theRead MoreBiography Of Leopold s A Sand County Almanac Essay1571 Words   |  7 PagesPart A When one reads Aldo Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac, it is difficult to not immediately find yourself lost in Leopold’s enchantment with the nature that surrounds him. Leopold describes, month by month, the activities of the animals and nature around him in such a way that one is able to truly appreciate the often missed miracles that are happening all around us. One can easily deduct that the theme of A Sand County Almanac is very boldly proclaimed as Leopold’s writings tell us to pauseRead MoreChristian Environmental Ethics1517 Words   |  7 Pagesand contemporary figures, it can be said that Christian ethical teachings have a significant influence on the lives of its adherents. A prime example of the effects of these teachings is the nature and practice of Christian environmental ethics. The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy defines environmental ethics as the discipline in philosophy that studies the moral relationship of human beings to, and also the v alue and moral status of, the environment and its nonhuman contents. Although each denominationRead More History of the Origins of Environmental Ethics Essay1045 Words   |  5 PagesHistory of the Origins of Environmental Ethics The inspiration for environmental ethics was the first Earth Day in 1970 when environmentalists started urging philosophers who were involved with environmental groups to do something about environmental ethics. An intellectual climate had developed in the last few years of the 1960s in large part because of the publication of two papers in Science: Lynn Whites The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis (March 1967) and Garett Hardins The TragedyRead MoreHuman Centered And Life Centered Systems Of Environmental Ethics1393 Words   |  6 Pagesof nature also. A significant development in Biocentrism has been Paul W. Taylor’s text, The Ethics of Respect for Nature (1, 1986) within which he brings to relevance four related ideas to be main pillars for the theory. These are labeled as â€Å"I. Human-Centered and Life-Centered Systems of Environmental Ethics† â€Å"II. The Good of A Being and The Concept of Inherent Worth† â€Å"III. The Attitude of Respect For Na ture† and the last being â€Å"IV. The Justifiability of The Attitude of Respect for Nature†. ItRead MoreHunting : The Truth About Hunting Essay1372 Words   |  6 Pagespeople think of the bahamas, or a five star hotel when a vacation is mentioned, however that is not true for all. For those who enjoy the outdoors and nature, a nice hunting trip speak more to them. Hunting has been seen in our culture for centuries as a way of reconnecting with nature, and in todays world with the lack of predators it is used to keep nature in balance, as well as keeping in touch with our ancestral traditions. Hunting is a part of our culture and has been all throughout history. â€Å"OurRead MoreEthical Ethics And Normative Ethics1078 Words   |  5 Pagestwo questions are examples of why mete-ethics and normative ethics exist. To be able to create an environmental ethic, one must have a sense of moral conclusion. Whether these morals are categorized through self-interest or obligation, meta ethics and normative ethics try to decipher these notions. To derive a normative ethic, meta-ethics needs to explain the language of morality, and how do humans come to a consensus of specific actions and thoughts. Ethics, by short definition, is how we (humans)

Legal Toolkit Problem Solving Process

Question: Discuss about the Legal Toolkit for Problem Solving Process. Answer: Introduction: While approaching a legal problem a lawyer has to go through various stages to ensure that all aspects of the problems are adequately addressed. The initial and primary requirement to approach a legal problem starts with understanding the legal issue. The lawyers must start understanding legal issues by separating them from regulatory issues. For the purpose of legal reasoning the lawyers should take a planned approach. The lawyers can do rule based reasoning for the purpose of solving legal issues. In the subsequent stage the lawyers must find out the relevant rules of the case and apply them to the facts himself to come to an expected conclusion. In the next stage after the rules have been analyzed the lawyers must rebut their own arguments to find out its defects and find ways to solve such problems. Critical thinking is of utmost importance with respect to lawyers. They must know both the pros and the cons of the approaches taken by them towards solving the legal problem. After a nalyzing all the pros and cons lawyers must come to a precise conclusion which should be be in the best interest of their clients. While analyzing the relevant rules of the case a lawyer must know how to reason through analogy that is ratio decidendi and obiter dicta. Two cases can never have same facts but the same rule may be applicable on them. For instance in a case where a person has a wolf as pet is liable to all actions of the wolf as it is a wild animal, the rule will also be applicable in the case where a person has a pet Pit-bull who is not a wild animal but still he would be accountable for its actions. The concept of inductive legal reasoning has to be adopted by the lawyers towards approaching a legal problem. In this approach the claims made by a lawyer has to be supported by judicial provisions. A lawyer in this regard has to analyze the decision of the court taken in different situation and apply such decisions of the present case. The lawyers towards approaching a legal problem must know how to find out differences between two cases having similar facts. The significance of understanding the use of technical languages towards approaching a legal problem is also very important to a lawyer in the stage of legal reasoning. Understanding legal language is not as difficult as it appears, it is important for lawyers to understand a few significant characteristics of legal languages. Lawyers must not use any abstract concepts with respect to the language they use in solving the legal problems. Abstract words like anyhow should not be used by lawyers while drafting a file for a particular case. A good lawyer should also understand that legal language often contain foreign language phrases like French and Latin phrases and it is important for lawyers to understand its meaning sop that they can ensure an appropriate approach towards problem solving. Details of specific tools, strategies and theories One of the major principles in relation to common law is the doctrine of precedent. According to this doctrine the courts are required to follow the decisions and ruling made by the higher courts in similar situations. All lawyers have different approach and discipline towards solving legal problems. There are various methods for determining what law is applicable in a situation and one of such methods is the doctrine of precedent. The law of precedents is one of the major theories used by lawyers to solve a legal problem. This doctrine is explained totally by the lain phrase of state decisis which literally means one should abided by the decisions made by the higher court and not to disturb matters which are settled. However it has to be noted in this case that the decision of court at the same level are not binding on then. For instance the decision of the district court of New South Wales will not be binding on the district court of West Australia. The decisions of higher courts o utside the jurisdiction of the smaller court would also not be binding on the court and would act only as guidance. The first thing which a lawyer has to keep in mind before using the doctrine precisely is the level of the court. This has to be done because the court at a higher level does not follow the decisions provided by a court at a lower level. Another thing the lawyers must have in mind towards the doctrine of stare decisis is that not all courts follow the practice of being bound by their own decision. There are several matters which a lawyer has to come across in his professional career. Most of the matters are of such nature which has already been addressed by the courts at some point of time. The decisions relating to such matters help the lawyers to construct a logical argument with respect to the present issues they are dealing with. Sometimes a judge may use a different method to solve a particular case and avoid following a precedent which would have been bound to follow. This method is generally used by the judges when they find that the material facts of the present case are different as compared to the law of the case they are bound to follow. This concept allows the courts to differentiate between the previous decisions from the present case which could have become a precedent for the courts to follow. It has to be noted in this case that the court have to prove that such difference between the facts of the cases exist in order to not to be bound by the precedent even if the court does not agree with the reasoning of the precedent. The concept of judicial precedent has to be complied with strictly in case legal distinction is not proved. Two cases which are used to explain the concept of distinction most commonly are the cases of Merritt v Merritt (1971) and Balfour v Balfour (1919). The common factor in both the cases was that the wife had made a claim against her husband in relation to the breach of contract. In the case of Balfour v Balfour the court decided that the wife is not entitled to claim breach of contract as the element of intention was absent in the contract and therefore the contract was not formed. The court in this case ruled that the agreement was not a contract and merely a domestic agreement. In the case of Merritt v Merritt the claimant and defendant were divorced and thus the court found that their relationship was more distant and different as compared to the previous case. This fact explained the reason why they opted to form the agreement in writing and therefore the court held the claim. Lawyers must allocate adequate time and reasoning in order to determine material differences between two similar cases. The concept of distinction between cases is essential for the lawyers to effectively use the doctrine of precedent. According to the principle of the Rule of Law, the nation has to be governed by the law and not arbitrary decisions of people at influential government positions. The main aim of this rule is to bring out the significance of law in society and particularly restricting arbitrary behavior by government officials. The rule implies that all citizens are equal before law and even lawmakers are not above the rule of law. This rule abolishes the practices of dictatorship, oligarchy or autocracy where rules made by government officials are above the law. According to Aristotle it is more beneficial if people are not ruled by a single citizen, and even if the supreme power of law is placed in a single person than the person must act merely as a servant of law. The rule abolishes the idea of divine rights where rulers were held to be above the law. This rule is used to determine the main dimensions of good governance within a country. The rule of law promotes confidence and trust within the nation as the people know that law will be applied consistently and equally. In Australia the main aim of the rule of law is to provide the citizens with a fair trial and promote equity. It is the duty of lawyers to promote the rule of law and use it efficiently to solve problems related to their cases. I have conducted research on various topics to appropriately complete my assignment. This research has given my considerable theoretical knowledge on how to solve legal problems. I have gained considerable knowledge on how to differentiate between cases having similar facts. I learned that I can distinguish between two cases based on both facts of the case and policies used in solving the case. I gained knowledge that in order to effectively apply the doctrine of precedent it is very important to determine the facts of present case and compare it to the facts of the case whose precedent is likely to be applicable. I did not have any idea that distinction is so important in order to anticipate and critically analyze the outcome of the present case. I would allocate adequate time to fide out small and significant details which might be different as compare to the case whose precedent is to be applied. I will also analyze the relevancy of the different material facts as compared to the precedent. References Aldisert, Hon Ruggero J.Logic for Lawyers: A Guide to Clear Legal Thinking. LexisNexis, 2015. Berman, Greg, and John Feinblatt.Good courts: The case for problem-solving justice. Vol. 8. Quid Pro Books, 2015. Butt, Peter.Modern legal drafting: a guide to using clearer language. Cambridge University Press, 2013. Craig, Paul P. "Pringle: legal reasoning, text, purpose and teleology."Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law(2013). Douglas, James, Eleanor Atkins, and Hamish Clift. "Judicial Rulings with Prospective Effect in Australia."Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions. Springer International Publishing, 2015. 349-358. Gageler, Stephen, and Brendan Lim. "Collective irrationality and the doctrine of precedent."Melb. UL Rev.38 (2014): 525. Gibbons, John.Language and the Law. Routledge, 2014. Jarvis, Robert M. "Legal History: Teaching Skills Practicing Lawyers Need."Am. J. Legal Hist.53 (2013): 498. Levi, Edward H.An introduction to legal reasoning. University of Chicago Press, 2013. Lindsay, Geoff. "Building a Nation: The Doctrine of Precedent in Australian Legal History."Historical Foundations of Australian Law: Institutions, Concepts and Personalities(2013): 267. Sternberg, Robert J., and Peter A. Frensch.Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms. Psychology Press, 2014. Vines, Prue.Law and Justice in Australia: Foundations of the legal system. Oxford University Press, 2013.